Monday 9 November 2009

Paranormal Activity

Against all the odds, Paranormal Actvity absolutely works. It's a genuinely scary horror movie. I'll let that sink in for a moment; when was the last time you saw a horror movie that did what it said on the tin?

Of course, horror movies (and books) should do more than scare; I at least expect a decent story as a foundation (the Saw movies can leave the room for a start), characters that I care about (Blair Witch, off you go too), and something with a degree of artistry about it (other genres can expect it, so why can't horror?)
Yes, there have been some great and good horror movies in recent years, but they are few and far between: The Orphanage, REC, Let The Right One In, The Descent... I'm sure there might be a couple more, but on the whole, the discerning horror fan has slim pickings to be honest.

So, yes against the odds, Paranormal Activity works. I hated Blair Witch Project with a passion; while I liked the concept, the execution was poor and underwhelming. It simply wasn't scary and I found the characters deeply annoying. I really didn't need or expect to find anything remotely interesting about another low-fi, mock non-fiction horror movie.

The story concerns a suburban couple, Katie and Micah, who, having recently moved in together, find themselves besieged by increasingly intrusive nighttime visits from an unseen and possibly demonic presence. As night-time eeriness is captured by a night-vision camera set up by Micah, further conversations reveal that Katie has been experiencing such hauntings for nearly two decades, since before her house burned down as a child. Katie can't escape; whatever it is is haunting her, not the house. A medium comes and goes, Micah borrows a ouija board that causes friction between the couple; then he unearths a similar story about a woman haunted and then possessed by a demon that plays on our generations' memories of seeing The Exorcist.

It's a slow and deep focused dread that first-time writer-director Oren Peli wrings from the set-up. Much of the tension is wrung from the night-time camera set-ups, focusing on the couple, their bed and the corridor beyond. Early on, you find yourself peering into the corridor, as the timecode rolls by on the camera, waiting for the jump, for the scare. The build-up is effective, almost ponderous at times, which makes the first real event all the more disturbing: As the clock spins like mad to show the passing of hours between phenomena there is the image of Katie rising from the bed and standing motionless, as if still asleep, for two hours straight, simply staring at Micah.
Soon you're dreading bed-time for the beseiged couple. Scene by scene, the claustrophobia and anxiety grows more and more palpable, and our bond with Katie and Micah stronger.
And it is genuinely unnerving. Later, the scares escalate as Katie and Micah begin to realise the inevitable: there's simply no escape.
And that's one of the great templates of horror, surely. That sense of control being lost, of events escalating beyond one's control, of despair replacing the status quo.
What really marks this out too is the believable performances of Micah Sloat and Katie Featherston (their names in reality too). They're wholly sympathetic and their set-up as a young couple is convincing enough so that a good percentage of the population can feel they could be these people. It's a classic horror set-up, and the reason Stephen King is one of the most popular writers in the world: these people could be you; this is how you might react. It's simple camp-fire horror story-telling, but its a desperately fine art to get it right.

By the time we get to the BIG scare in Paranormal Activity (and for me, it raised all the hairs on the back of my neck and left me reticent to climb into bed that night), it becomes clear that a young man with a couple of cameras and a bit of cash, filming in his own house has produced something that most horror movies from big studios cannot: a ghost train of a film that plays right into our homes and basic fears and leaves us a little bit afraid of the dark. It's just a shame that as time goes on, the exectations of the film from all these glowing reviews will doubtless diminish the impact of this brilliant little film.
So check your expectations at the door and try and see this movie soon.

8 comments:

fluid69 said...

Not seen it yet, but I've been hearing nothing but good things about this film. I'm not a big POV camera movie fan, although I loved REC, and I agree with you about Blair and and I spit on Saw's grave (to follow the theme of crap horror films).

I think the PR machine around this flick has been boosted no end by Spielberg's comments about it - seriously, who could ask for better publicity than someone that big saying it scared him so much he had to watch it during the day. Big wuss? Maybe, but it certainly doesn't hurt ticket sales having blurb like that floating around.

fluid69 said...

Oh, on the subject of film, I saw Fantastic Mr. Fox at cinema last week. Never been much of a Wes Anderson fan, but I really enjoyed this little flick. Everything about it seemed to work, for some reason. The lo-fi stop-motion animation really worked well, and George Clooney playing a Fox somehow seems like perfect casting. Meryl Streep's great value as his wife too. The humour is fairly nuts, and more than a little dark in places (well, it is Roald Dahl), but it's very funny in other places too. Not really a kids film, as I think most of it will go over their heads. Bit hard to explain it really, it's one of those you need to see to appreciate it properly.

Simon Avery said...

Well worth catching up with PA when it shows. Not sure how it plays in a cinema - watching it on a computer seemed to work even more in its favour; not sure if in a theatre it might lose some of its Lo-Fi vibe or not.
Like the look of Fantastic Mr Fox - will try to catch it at some point.

Anonymous said...

Glad you enjoyed it, saw it a few weeks ago and it blew us away.
Totally agree with you on Blair Witch, and the fact that the characters in this are believable and you genuinely feel for them.
It is the escalating dread that gets to you as you watch it, I was practically watching through my fingers during one bit.
Why they couldn't have got it together to release it over Halloween I do not know, it would have been an ideal time to do so.
The ending is different in the Theatrical version, it's up on Youtube and worth a watch.

Bri

Simon Avery said...

Glad you enjoyed it too, Bri. It's great to see a genuinely scary horror movie that achieves what it sets out to do so brilliantly.
I'll check out that alternate ending - I did read about it but felt the earlier 'quieter' (sort of) low key ending that we saw was the better way to go to keep the mood of it.
It's been a long time since I watched a horror movie that lingered so much in my mind. I made sure I kept an eye on the door when I was in bed that night!

Unknown said...

Simon, I hope you're well. Wanted to pick your brains. I wondered how long TTA take to get back to people who've submitted short stories for Crime Wave?

thanks

best

Simon Avery said...

Hi Joel,
Andy over at CRimewave tends to get bogged down with submissions from time to time, so he can take a while with stories. If he hasn't replied after a couple of months, it's worth emailing him to give him a nudge and he'll ususally let you know.
Hope this helps. All the best, Simon

Unknown said...

Yes, it does, thanks. I've taken the plunge and written my first prose short story. It's a detective story hence Crime Wave.

I am coming up to Brum for Focus, photo show in just under two weeks.